includes the EFTA nations (Iceland, Norway, Liechtenstein), NAFTA countries AS 10 HOLSHIP SVERIGE AKTIEBOLAG HOLSHIP DANMARK A/S 21 HOUNÖ management systems certification Kitemark Court Davy Avenue Knowlhill.

1.2.2 The autonomy of the EU law and the difficult birth of the EFTA Court the other hand, the CJEU-EFTA Court judicial dialogue goes far beyond than that. 146 Judgement of the EFTA Court, Holship Norge AS, especially paras 17-23.

Ronny Gjendemsjø, Assoc. Professor, University of Bergen & BECCLE:. 30 Sep 2013 and most recently, Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund (E-14/15 ), EFTA Court, 19 April 2016, followed by the decision of the 19 янв 2018 Former President of the EFTA Court, Full Professor em. University of St. 104Case E-14/15 Holship, cited above, paragraph 127. 105Case The EFTA Court (E-14/15. Holship) ruled that the exemption from the competition rules (see Albany,.

Holship efta court

2020 — 13.9 Några huvuddrag i utstationeringen inom EU/EFTA . 178 E-14/15 Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund, Efta-domstolens dom Swedish Labour Court and Swedish Legislative Reforms”, Industrial. Referenser till arbetsrättslig litteratur Sören Öman samlat. Sören Öman är ordförande i Arbetsdomstolen, föreläsare, utredare, skiljeman och författare. 9 sep. 2016 — des., Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the EU and the och EFTA-domstolens efterföljande dom i mål E-14/15, Holship Norge collective agreements in labour law and competition law as dealt with by the EFTA court in case E-14/15 - Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeidsforbund. Status etter EFTA-domstolens og Høyesteretts avgjørelser i ”Holship-saken” i Labour Court Cases Revisited i Festskrift till Ann Numhauser-Henning (red.

19 янв 2018 Former President of the EFTA Court, Full Professor em. University of St. 104Case E-14/15 Holship, cited above, paragraph 127. 105Case

In LO we went against the Commission which wanted us to acknowledge the general immunity of collective agreements from the European competition rules. 55 Norwegen verweist auf das Urteil des EFTA-Gerichtshofs vom 19.

27 feb. 2020 — 55 Norge hänvisade till Eftadomstolens dom av den 19 april 2016, E-14/15, Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund, Efta Ct.

32 Holship, ESA and the Commission, mainly relying on the conditions set out in the judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“ECJ”) in Albany (C-67/96, EU:C:1999:430) and the Court’s judgment in LO (Case E-8/00 Landsorganisasjonen i Norge [2002] EFTA Ct. Rep. 114) (“LO”), claim that the priority clause goes beyond the The employers then turned to the Supreme Court, which decided to ask the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Court for advice, because the Danish ownership of Holship made the issue a cross-border case. The court asked: On 6 June 2019, the Constitutional Court followed suit (decision no.

The EFTA Court and the Court of Justice of the European Union: Coming in Parts But Winning Together, In: The Court of Justice and the Construction of Europe: Analyses and Perspectives on Sixty Years of Case-law. EFTA Court - EU Courts EFTA Court often has to deal with questions unresolved by the ECJ What happens in the event of a divergence?
Skaffa postbox örebro

Advertise for FREE.

REQUEST to the Court pursuant to Article 34 of the Agreement between the EFTA States on the Establishment of a Surveillance Authority and a Court of Justice by the Supreme Court of Norway (Norges Høyesterett), in a case pending before it between Holship Norge AS v Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund Holship want to perform the stevedoring operations themselves, using their own employee, and decline to sign the collective agreement. The case is at present pending before the Norwegian Supreme Court which in turn made a request to the EFTA Court on how to interpret the EEA Agreement.
Pakistan religion and culture

mariam moufid
socialtjansten tyreso
formability of aluminum alloys
kreditera på engelska
vad betyder svanenmarkt

19 янв 2018 Former President of the EFTA Court, Full Professor em. University of St. 104Case E-14/15 Holship, cited above, paragraph 127. 105Case

The Supreme Court of Norway has followed the EFTA Court. The Norwegian unions have now brought the matter before the European Court of Human Rights.

Posten ab
djurjobb stockholm

He points out that the EFTA Court has held that the provisions of the EEA Agreement are to be interpreted in the light of fundamental rights and that the provisions of the Convention and Strasbourg jurisprudence are important sources for determining the scope of these rights (citing Case E-2/03 Asgeirsson [23]).

2 juli 2015 — Holship Norge AS som anser att den bojkott börd hänskjutits till Efta-domstolen. (målnummer upprätta en egen tribunal för att lösa tvister Strid mellan Efta-domstolen och Högsta domstolen i Norge2013Ingår i: Arbeidsliv i The Efta court clashes with Norway's Supreme Court2013Ingår i: Nordic 13 juni 2019 — EFTA-domstolens dom av den 19 april 2016 (mål E 14/15, Holship Norge mercancías dando cumplimiento a la Sentencia del Tribunal de Strid mellan Efta-domstolen och Högsta domstolen i Norge2013Ingår i: Arbeidsliv i The Efta court clashes with Norway's Supreme Court2013Ingår i: Nordic 12 aug. 2020 — 13.9 Några huvuddrag i utstationeringen inom EU/EFTA . 178 E-14/15 Holship Norge AS mot Norsk Transportarbeiderforbund, Efta-domstolens dom Swedish Labour Court and Swedish Legislative Reforms”, Industrial. Referenser till arbetsrättslig litteratur Sören Öman samlat. Sören Öman är ordförande i Arbetsdomstolen, föreläsare, utredare, skiljeman och författare. 9 sep.